Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Classic_TV_and_Radio_Fan Date: Jan 4, 2009 2:01pm
Forum: classic_tv Subject: The Middle Ages were way better than The Roman Times

The Roman ages are EXTREMELY overrated, the middle ages was so much better. The Middle Ages featured great fashion, awesome wars, sexy kings, great house designs, and some of the loveliest music ever. I can still remember the time I helped England defeat the french, those were good times. The Roman Ages were decent for fashion but roman warfare was not fun in the slightest! Plus I lost my house in the great fire. Not long after Rome became a republic, I knew I had enough and I for some time joined various warrior tribes, but they weren't very cultured. The Dark Ages SUCKED big time, so The Middle Ages were a welcome change.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Meatpies Date: Jan 4, 2009 2:47pm
Forum: classic_tv Subject: Re: The Middle Ages were way better than The Roman Times

Yeah, but once you've gone "gladiator"... I mean, seriously...

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)